Compare sites
every matchup, on recorded pulls — pick any two · data refreshed 2026-07-05 15:01 UTC · by RipIndex, independent — methodology
Pick any two platforms we track and get the head-to-head: odds transparency, what independent checking is possible on each, buyback economics, and what recorded pulls have actually returned. Same data as the live board — arranged as a decision.
Every matchup
The field at a glance
| Site | Chain | Publishes odds? | Independent check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collector Crypt | Solana | No | RipIndex reverse-engineers from the public pull feed |
| Courtyard | Polygon | Yes (odds, EV, buyback) | RipIndex audits pack-opens on-chain vs published odds |
| Tilt Rips | off-chain | Buckets only (midpoints mislead) | RipIndex records every feed pull; realized vs marketed EV |
| Phygitals | Solana | Yes (odds per pack) | RipIndex audits the live feed + verifies pulls as Solana NFTs |
One thing no matchup changes: every platform here is negative expected value on average. The comparisons tell you how the house edge differs — in size, and in how honestly it's disclosed — not how to beat it.
More from RipIndex
Frequently asked
Which sites can I compare?
Every platform RipIndex tracks with a full data page: Collector Crypt, Courtyard, Tilt Rips, and Phygitals — any pair, head to head. New platforms join the comparisons as our collectors accumulate enough recorded data to say something honest.
What data do the comparisons use?
The same live dataset as the RipIndex board: recorded pulls from each platform's public feed (and blockchain where applicable), published odds where they exist, our independent audits of those odds, and buyback economics. No sponsored input — the methodology is public.
Is any site the +EV choice?
No. Every platform we track returns less than cost on average once you cash out. Comparing tells you whose edge is smaller and whose numbers are verifiable — not which one makes you money.