Monster (MNSTR) vs Beezie

the most checkable small site vs the least · data refreshed 2026-07-11 16:56 UTC · by RipIndex, independent — methodology

Two of the category's smaller on-chain entrants — and the sharpest verifiability contrast on this site. Monster (MNSTR) publishes odds and exposes exact lifetime pull counters in its MegaETH contracts; RipIndex reads them directly and verifies pulls on-chain. Beezie runs claw machines on Base with verified-real contracts — but no public per-pull feed exists, so its published odds and payout rates can't be independently checked by us or anyone else. On our board its numbers are labelled exactly that way: theirs.

Head to head

	Monster	Beezie
Chain	MegaETH	Base
Publishes odds	Yes (odds per pack)	Yes — with no public pull feed to check them against
Independent check	exact lifetime pull counters read from its own contracts; RipIndex verifies pulls on-chain	contracts verified real on Base; payout rates unverifiable — published numbers shown as theirs
Price range	$50–$1,250	$30–$500
Buyback	86–95% swap-back (per pack)	~94% swap-back (their published rate)
Realized / cash-out	-4.1% realized edge, 7 days (15,868 pulls, at swap-back)	unverifiable — no per-pull feed exists; published numbers only

The honest verdict

On verifiability: Monster, and it isn't close. Exact counters plus on-chain pull verification versus published claims with no feed to test them against. That doesn't make Beezie a scam — its contracts are real and verified on Base — but it does mean playing there is an act of trust in the operator's numbers, where playing Monster is an act of trust in arithmetic you can recompute. On the board: Monster is ranked on measured realized returns; Beezie is display-only, because ranking unverifiable numbers as if they were measurements would be dishonest. On profitability: neither — Beezie's own published rates describe a negative-EV game, and Monster's measured returns agree about its own.

Detail on Monster and Beezie; both appear on the tier board under those exact rules.

More from RipIndex

The live board — every site, updating by the minute Rip Lab — open packs on each site's real odds, paper money only Compare any two sites — head to head, on data Best Pokémon card gacha sites, ranked by real EV Pokémon mystery pack odds — published vs what really drops The Odds Report — published vs realized odds Odds change log — who changed their odds, and when Site odds & realized EV: Collector Crypt · Courtyard · Tilt Rips · Phygitals · GachaPull · Monster · Beezie

Frequently asked

Is Beezie a scam?

We have no evidence of that — its machines run on real, verified Base contracts. What Beezie lacks is a public per-pull feed, so its published odds and payout rates are unverifiable claims rather than checkable numbers. RipIndex shows them clearly labelled as the site's own figures.

Why is Monster ranked on RipIndex's tier board but Beezie isn't?

Ranking requires measured realized returns. Monster's come from recorded pulls plus exact contract counters. Beezie exposes no pull data at all, so it appears display-only — with its published numbers labelled as theirs, not ours.

Which is safer to play?

Both are −EV, so "safe" means "informed." Monster is the better-informed bet by a wide margin: you can see exactly how many pulls have happened and what they returned. With Beezie you're trusting the operator's published rates.

Gambling with negative EV — on average you lose money · 18+ · not financial advice · problem? 1-800-GAMBLER · full disclosures

The honest footer on every page we publish: opening packs is gambling with negative expected value — on average you lose money, on every site we track. RipIndex is independent and informational; not affiliated with any platform; not financial advice. If gambling is a problem: 1-800-GAMBLER · ncpgambling.org.