Beezie: real machines, unverifiable payouts
Base · claw machines · no pull feed (published numbers only) · data refreshed 2026-09-15 01:31 UTC · by RipIndex, independent — methodology
Beezie (beezie.io) runs claw machines for graded cards on Base. The machines are real — RipIndex confirms each one is a live contract on-chain. Beezie has no per-pull feed, so we can't show what any single open returned — but because its instant buyback settles in USDC on-chain, we do measure a site-wide realized recovery (all buyback USDC out ÷ all USDC paid in, across its shared treasury). See the live board for that measured recovery; the table below is Beezie's own published odds tiers and quoted average card values.
Beezie's own numbers (unaudited by design)
| Machine | Price | Their quoted avg value | Implied cash-out edge | Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wildcard | $30 | $33 | +3.4% | paused |
| Wildcard | $30 | $32 | +0.3% | 366 in stock |
| Silver TCG | $50 | $0 | -100.0% | paused |
| Silver TCG | $50 | $56 | +5.3% | 925 in stock |
| Gold TCG | $250 | $276 | +3.8% | paused |
| Gold TCG | $250 | $266 | +0.0% | 702 in stock |
| Platinum TCG | $500 | $560 | +5.3% | paused |
| Platinum TCG | $500 | $527 | -0.9% | 695 in stock |
The implied edge takes Beezie's own quoted average, applies its buyback, and divides by price — what a machine returns on paper, if their numbers are right. Right now that paper number reads -0.9% to +5.3% — either side of cost depending on the machine. It is Beezie's claim, not a measurement: no pull record exists to test it. We can't check those numbers against reality the way we do everywhere else, and honest labeling beats false precision: Beezie never ranks on our tier board for exactly this reason.
More from RipIndex
Frequently asked
Is Beezie legit?
The machines are real, live contracts on Base — we verify their existence continuously. Whether the payouts match the published odds is unverifiable: Beezie exposes no per-pull feed, so no independent record of outcomes exists. Treat its numbers as claims, not measurements.
Why doesn't RipIndex show realized EV for Beezie?
Realized EV requires recorded pulls, and Beezie publishes none. Rather than estimate, we show its published odds and quoted averages, clearly labeled as theirs — and Beezie never ranks on our tier board, where only measured packs compete.
What does Beezie's implied edge mean?
It's Beezie's own quoted average card value × its buyback ÷ machine price — what a machine returns on paper, if their numbers are accurate. Right now it reads -0.9% to +5.3% (either side of cost depending on the machine) — but with no pull record to check it against, that is Beezie's claim, not a measurement. Every site we can actually measure runs negative once you cash out.
Gambling with negative EV — on average you lose money · 18+ · not financial advice · problem? 1-800-GAMBLER · full disclosures
The honest footer on every page we publish: opening packs is gambling with negative expected value — on average you lose money, on every site we track. RipIndex is independent and informational; not affiliated with any platform; not financial advice. If gambling is a problem: 1-800-GAMBLER · ncpgambling.org.