Courtyard vs Tilt Rips

a number you can check vs a number that flatters · data refreshed 2026-07-05 16:27 UTC · by RipIndex, independent — methodology

On paper, Tilt Rips looks like the better deal — its packs advertise theoretical EV above price, while Courtyard's published EV sits honestly below it once buyback is applied. That's exactly why this comparison is worth making: one number has an independent on-chain audit behind it, the other is bucket-midpoint arithmetic that our recorded pulls contradict.

Head to head

CourtyardTilt Rips
ChainPolygonoff-chain
Publishes oddsYes (odds, EV, buyback)Buckets only (midpoints mislead)
Independent checkRipIndex audits pack-opens on-chain vs published oddsRipIndex records every feed pull; realized vs marketed EV
Price range$15–$5,000$10–$3,000
Buyback~84.6% of value
Realized / cash-outcash-out EV ~82% of costrealized ~95% of cost at market value (14,969 pulls)

The honest verdict

On trustworthiness of the posted number: Courtyard, by a wide margin. It publishes odds, EV and buyback per pack, and our ongoing audit — reading its actual pack-opens off Polygon — keeps confirming them. Tilt Rips' +EV figure is theory built on wide prize buckets; every stretch of realized pulls we've recorded lands below pack price. Beware the apples-to-oranges trap: Tilt Rips' realized ~90-something percent of cost is at market value before liquidation, while Courtyard's ~82% is the money actually in your hand after instant buyback — the honest gap between them is smaller than it looks. On profitability: neither. The difference is whether the house edge is disclosed or discovered.

The audit lives in the Odds Report; pack-by-pack numbers on the board.

More from RipIndex

Frequently asked

Tilt Rips shows +EV and Courtyard doesn't — is Tilt Rips better?

No. Tilt Rips' +EV is theoretical, computed from prize-bucket midpoints; realized pulls return cards worth less than pack price. Courtyard's published EV is near price and honest about the buyback haircut — and unusually, it survives an independent on-chain audit.

Whose odds can you actually verify?

Courtyard's: RipIndex reads its pack-opens directly off Polygon and compares them with the published odds. Tilt Rips is off-chain, so verification stops at recording its public feed — which is exactly what we do, continuously.

What does each pack actually return?

Courtyard: instant cash-out lands around 82% of pack price on most packs. Tilt Rips: recorded pulls return cards worth roughly 91–99% of pack price at market value — before you sell them. Both are losses on average; the live tables on each site page carry the current numbers.

The honest footer on every page we publish: opening packs is gambling with negative expected value — on average you lose money, on every site we track. RipIndex is independent and informational; not affiliated with any platform; not financial advice. If gambling is a problem: 1-800-GAMBLER · ncpgambling.org.